Nordic Translation Pages
- Nordic Marketing Content Translation Services
- Medical Translation
- Scandinavian Translation Services. What Do We Mean by the Quality?
- Scandinavian and Baltic Media Translation Services
- Scandinavian Business and Financial Translation Services
- Multilingual Transcription
- Scandinavian Website Translation and Localization
- Certified Translation Services in the EU Countries
- Scandinavian and Baltic Legal Translations
- Scandinavian and Nordic Languages
- Multilingual Desktop Publishing
- Languages of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE)
- Nordic Technical Translations
- EU languages
- Western European Languages
- Svensk blogg
- Free of charge price request
- Document Translation Services
Monday, 24 October 2016
Web Globalization: Does Your Site Support Arabic, Hebrew, Albanian, Hindi, Persian, Malaysian, Azeri, and Mongolian Languages?
Friday, 14 October 2016
The Broadband Commission for Digital Development, an organization established six years ago to monitor the growth and use of the Internet around the world, released its 2015 report on the state of broadband.
The report argues that representation of the world's languages online remains one of the major challenges in expanding the Internet to reach the four billion people who don’t yet have access.
At the moment, the Internet only has webpages in about five percent of the world's languages.
Even national languages like Hindi and Swahili are used on only .01 percent of the 10 million most popular websites. The majority of the world’s languages lack an online presence that is actually useful.
Ethnologue, a directory of the world’s living languages, has determined that 1,519 out of the 7,100 languages spoken today are in danger of extinction. For these threatened languages, social-networking sites like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram, which rely primarily on user-generated content, as well as other digital platforms like Google and Wikipedia, have a chance to contribute to their preservation. While the best way to keep a language alive is to speak it, using one’s native language online could help.
One such under-resourced language is Chichewa, a Bantu language spoken by 12 million people, many of whom are in the country of Malawi. According to Edmond Kachale, a programmer who began developing a basic word processor for the language in 2005 and has been working on translating Google search into Chichewa for the last five years, his language doesn’t have sufficient content online. This makes it difficult for its speakers to compete in a digital, globalized world.
“Unless a language improves its visibility in the digital world,” he says, “it is heading for extinction.”
In Malawi, over 60 percent of the population lacks Internet access; but Kachale says that “even if there would be free Internet nation-wide, chances are that [Chichewa speakers] may not use it at all because of the language barrier.” The 2015 Broadband Report bears Kachale’s point out. Using the benchmark of 100,000 Wikipedia pages in any given language, it found that only 53 percent of the world’s population has access to sufficient content in their native language to make use of the Internet relevant.
UNESCO has designated Aymara as “vulnerable.” Beginning in May of 2014, a group of 20 volunteer translators have been chipping away at the 25,000 words used on the site—and the project is on course to be finished by Christmas.
The project is important because it will encourage young people to use their native language. “We are sure when Aymara is available on Facebook as an official language, it will be a source of motivation for Aymara people,” says Elias Quisepe Chura, who manages the translation effort (it happens primarily online, unsurprisingly via a Facebook page).
Ruben Hilari, another member of the translation team, told the Spanish newspaper El Pais, “Aymara is alive. It does not need to be revitalized. It needs to be strengthened and that is exactly what we are doing. If we do not work for our language and culture today, it will be too late tomorrow to remember who we are, and we will always feel insecure about our identity.”
Despite its reputation as the so-called information superhighway, the Internet is only legible to speakers of a few languages; this limit to the web’s accessibility proves that it can be as just as insular and discriminative as the modern world at large.